$60 Carbon Super Shoe vs $350 Nike Alphafly 3
A video on YouTube. In Fitness, a Krater category.
Watch on YouTubeSummary by Krater
A runner compares a $350 pair of Nike Alphafly Next% 3 running shoes against a $60 budget alternative (Onemix Carbon Plate Marathon Running Shoes) using treadmill tests, lactate and heart rate data, and a running form app.
From the video
Answers: Are budget carbon plate running shoes as good as expensive ones like Nike Alphafly?
- carbon plate running shoes
- budget vs premium running shoes
- running form test
- heart rate and blood lactate monitoring during running
What it concludes
- Nike Alphafly Next% 3 shoes won the weight department at 222 grams compared to 257 grams for Onemix.
- Nike Alphafly shoes provide a softer, more bouncy feel and cushioning compared to Onemix.
- Running form score was slightly better with the expensive Nike Alphafly shoes at 71.3 versus 70 for Onemix.
- Average blood lactate was lower with Nike Alphafly at 2.9 mmol/L compared to 3.3 mmol/L with Onemix.
- Expensive Nike Alphafly shoes take home the overall win in this test over the Onemix budget alternative.
Rate it, review it and add it to your lists in Krater.
Titles and thumbnails from YouTube. Krater isn't affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by YouTube or Google.