Historian Reacts - Why EVERY massive battle is wrong!
A video on YouTube. In History, a Krater category.
Watch on YouTubeSummary by Krater
This video examines historical battle formations using Unreal Engine 5 simulations to debunk the myth of massive, deeply packed ancient armies, concluding that real battle lines were actually wide and thin.
From the video
Answers: What did ancient armies actually look like in battle?
- ancient army size
- battle formations
- phalanx depth
- Roman legion formation
- Spartan combat tactics
What it concludes
- Ancient armies did not use massive, deeply packed hordes as commonly depicted in movies.
- Battle formations prioritized width over depth to prevent being flanked and outmaneuvered.
- Most ancient battle formations were only 6 to 8 ranks deep.
- Depth in ancient formations provided morale support rather than actual pushing power.
- Effective force transfer from rear ranks diminishes rapidly beyond 10 to 12 men deep.
Rate it, review it and add it to your lists in Krater.
Titles and thumbnails from YouTube. Krater isn't affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by YouTube or Google.